<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conventions-Based Binding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/</link>
	<description>Rambling and occasional wisdom from Nate Kohari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Web Nuggets #20 : Code Monkey Labs</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Web Nuggets #20 : Code Monkey Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=92#comment-175</guid>
		<description>[...] Conventions-Based Binding Using Ninject: Nate Kohari shows how easy it is to use &quot;convention over configuration&quot; with your bindings using Ninject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conventions-Based Binding Using Ninject: Nate Kohari shows how easy it is to use &quot;convention over configuration&quot; with your bindings using Ninject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Kohari</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Kohari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=92#comment-172</guid>
		<description>@kentaromiura: Yes, that&#039;s true. Any sort of conventions-based approach means that you have to be careful if you change your conventions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kentaromiura: Yes, that&#8217;s true. Any sort of conventions-based approach means that you have to be careful if you change your conventions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kentaromiura</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>kentaromiura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=92#comment-173</guid>
		<description>This approach have a little issue, if you later want to rename a parameter, you need to remember to change the configuration, since intellisense doesn&#039;t change strings for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This approach have a little issue, if you later want to rename a parameter, you need to remember to change the configuration, since intellisense doesn&#8217;t change strings for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Carter</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/07/05/conventions-based-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=92#comment-174</guid>
		<description>That last code sample is beautiful, I love the fluent interface. I&#039;m actually developing a sample that looks very similar for associating action filters with controller actions using a convention/criteria system for ASP.NET MVC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last code sample is beautiful, I love the fluent interface. I&#8217;m actually developing a sample that looks very similar for associating action filters with controller actions using a convention/criteria system for ASP.NET MVC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
