Ninject 2 Reaches Beta!
Since I published this post, I’ve moved the Ninject 2 source to Github. Both the downloads available here and the experimental branch in Subversion is outdated and will be removed eventually. Read more here.
A month or so ago, I started a spike of a new version of Ninject to test out some ideas that have been floating around in my head. I fully intended to throw it away and integrate what I’d learned into the existing Ninject codebase – but gradually the spike grew into what I’m now calling Ninject 2, which I’m proud to say has reached beta status!
Ninject 2 is essentially a rewrite of the original codebase, but that’s not to suggest that anything is particularly wrong with the code that went into Ninject 1.x. When I started writing Ninject in early 2007, I was targeting .NET 2.0 and didn’t have the fancy toys that I have now – namely LINQ and expression trees. Ninject 2 takes full advantage of LINQ, and I’ve actually jokingly referred to it as “LINQ to IoC”.
Also, I felt that some parts of Ninject 1.x were over-designed, so the development of Ninject 2 has been driven by an obsession with simplicity. To give you an idea of how much simpler Ninject 2 is, the trunk build of Ninject 1.x weighs in at 177KB, and Ninject 2 is just about 80KB.
I’m going to be blogging about the design of Ninject 2 and the differences between it and Ninject 1.x quite a bit over the next few weeks, but here’s a quick overview:
Things that are in Ninject 2 that were not in Ninject 1.x:
- Cache-and-collect lifecycle management: Rather than using binding behaviors, Ninject 2 uses a scoping system and leverages the garbage collector to reclaim instances. I’m very excited about this improvement, and it deserves a post unto itself to explain it.
- Multi-injection: The kernel in Ninject 2 now has
GetAll<T>()methods, and supports injection of multiple targets with types
List<T>, and arrays of
- Constrained resolution: Rather than just declaring conditional bindings, constraining predicates can now flow into a resolution request from the point of injection. This creates a very powerful push/pull system for resolution, which also deserves its own post.
- Common Service Locator support: Because of multi-injection, Ninject 2 now has full support for the CSL.
- Optional modules: You can now register bindings directly on the kernel; modules are optional. If you register bindings in a module, and then unload the bindings, the bindings will be un-registered.
- Automatic module scanning: Ninject 2 can scan directories for assemblies that contain modules, and load them into the kernel.
- Simplified extension model: Internally, Ninject 2 relies on an inversion of control container of its own, reducing factory bloat and making extension of the core much simpler.
- Mono support: I haven’t had a chance to test this very well, but it’s something I want to make sure Ninject 2 has.
Things that were in Ninject 1.x that are not in Ninject 2:
- Support for .NET 2.0: Since Ninject 2 relies on LINQ and expression trees, .NET 2.0 support is now no longer possible.
- Field injection: Ninject 2’s injection is now driven by expression trees, and in .NET 3.5 there is no way to set field values with an expression tree. Since this is a bad practice anyway, I decided to cut it.
- Private member injection: Again, not supported by expression trees, and a bad practice, so it has been cut.
- Behavior attributes: Since behaviors have been cut and replaced by GC-driven scopes, attributes like
[Singleton]no longer make sense. I may re-add these if people scream loud enough.
- Logging infrastructure: Cut because it wasn’t really useful anyway. Ninject doesn’t generate logging messages of its own anymore, but I’m looking into alternative sources of introspection.
- AOP/Interception: This has been removed from the core for simplicity.
- Compact framework support: This is missing from the beta, but I may re-add it for the official release.
A few notes:
- The core namespace is now just
- The default scope is now singleton rather than transient.
- Some extensions are missing (Messaging, in particular). They may re-appear before release.
Ninject 2 also has new constructor selection semantics:
- If a constructor has an
[Inject]attribute, it is used. If multiple constructors have an
[Inject]attribute, the behavior is undefined.
- If no constructors have an
[Inject]attribute, Ninject will select the one with the most parameters.
- If no constructors are defined, Ninject will select the default parameterless constructor.
Right now, the source is in an experimental branch on the Ninject subversion repository, but it will soon be moving to the trunk. You can also download the various builds here.
I’m interested in all feedback (good and bad), so please let me know what you think!