Comments on: Ninject 2 Reaches Beta! http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/ Rambling and occasional wisdom from Nate Kohari Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:45:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Using Ninject 2 to resolve conditional bindings with a kernel « Deliberating On Software Development http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2784 Using Ninject 2 to resolve conditional bindings with a kernel « Deliberating On Software Development Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:37:51 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-2784 [...] Filed under: Uncategorized — x97mdr @ 12:25 am A while ago I saw that Nate Kohari was working on a beta version of Ninject, called Ninject 2.  I use Ninject 1.0 in my projects and I’m really happy.  It has a clean API and is [...] [...] Filed under: Uncategorized — x97mdr @ 12:25 am A while ago I saw that Nate Kohari was working on a beta version of Ninject, called Ninject 2.  I use Ninject 1.0 in my projects and I’m really happy.  It has a clean API and is [...]

]]> By: Nolan Egly http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2771 Nolan Egly Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:18:25 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-2771 +1 for Compact Framework support, this why I'm using Ninject. Congrats on the beta release! +1 for Compact Framework support, this why I’m using Ninject.

Congrats on the beta release!

]]> By: Eric http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2711 Eric Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:38:17 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-2711 Hi Nate, I have started using Ninject 1.x in a project, great tool! We have recently heard about MEF and after reading these articles http://blogs.msdn.com/nblumhardt/archive/2009/03/16/hosting-mef-extensions-in-an-ioc-container.aspx http://ondevelopment.blogspot.com/2009/03/unleashing-modules.html we are now considering using an IoC container with MEF. Unfortunately, Ninject does not provide an MEF adapter (like Autofac or Unity), but I wonder if the Automatic module scanning feature is actually doing something similar to what MEF does? Thanks Hi Nate,

I have started using Ninject 1.x in a project, great tool!

We have recently heard about MEF and after reading these articles
http://blogs.msdn.com/nblumhardt/archive/2009/03/16/hosting-mef-extensions-in-an-ioc-container.aspx
http://ondevelopment.blogspot.com/2009/03/unleashing-modules.html
we are now considering using an IoC container with MEF.
Unfortunately, Ninject does not provide an MEF adapter (like Autofac or Unity), but I wonder if the Automatic module scanning feature is actually doing something similar to what MEF does?

Thanks

]]> By: Urs Enzler http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-258 Urs Enzler Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:56:45 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-258 I just started using NInject and refactored a very small test application from Unity to NInject 2. The first thing I noticed: NInject error messages are far better than the cryptic error description of Unity. So, after spending about 15 minutes refactoring, all is up and running. Really cool! As others stated, I'd be glad if CF support would stay in. The reason is, that our company has a lot of "normal" .net projects as well as CF projects, and we like to be able to reuse our stuff and therefore the injection container. Keep up the great work Cheers Urs I just started using NInject and refactored a very small test application from Unity to NInject 2. The first thing I noticed: NInject error messages are far better than the cryptic error description of Unity. So, after spending about 15 minutes refactoring, all is up and running. Really cool!

As others stated, I’d be glad if CF support would stay in. The reason is, that our company has a lot of “normal” .net projects as well as CF projects, and we like to be able to reuse our stuff and therefore the injection container.

Keep up the great work
Cheers
Urs

]]> By: Justin http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-259 Justin Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:44:28 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-259 Nate, I was actually getting ready to adopt unity for an IOC due to its service locater support. Great to see this will be in Ninject 2! Do you have a release date yet for v2? Nate, I was actually getting ready to adopt unity for an IOC due to its service locater support. Great to see this will be in Ninject 2! Do you have a release date yet for v2?

]]> By: Steven H http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-256 Steven H Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:07:45 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-256 Please, dont drop CF support - Think about the children !!!!!!! Please, dont drop CF support – Think about the children !!!!!!!

]]> By: Eric Hamrick http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-257 Eric Hamrick Tue, 26 May 2009 00:37:31 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-257 Another person using Ninject 1.0 on mobile devices. Hoping to see 2.0 supported on CF as well. :) Eric Another person using Ninject 1.0 on mobile devices. Hoping to see 2.0 supported on CF as well. :)

Eric

]]> By: Ross http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Ross Tue, 05 May 2009 15:23:22 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-255 Ninject 2.0 has some great features we've been looking for including Multi-Injection. However one of the reasons we chose Ninject was due to the CF support. Please add CF support to 2.0!! Ninject 2.0 has some great features we’ve been looking for including Multi-Injection. However one of the reasons we chose Ninject was due to the CF support. Please add CF support to 2.0!!

]]> By: Eric http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Eric Tue, 05 May 2009 15:22:42 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-254 Nate, We chose Ninject because of its .NET CF support. We love it, but really need the multi-injection support. Please keep CF support as the valuable feature it is. Thanks, Eric Nate,

We chose Ninject because of its .NET CF support. We love it, but really need the multi-injection support. Please keep CF support as the valuable feature it is.

Thanks,
Eric

]]> By: Customizing Ninject 2.0 Behaviour to use the Default Constructor on InjectAttribute-less classes. « Ben Ellis’s Blog http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Customizing Ninject 2.0 Behaviour to use the Default Constructor on InjectAttribute-less classes. « Ben Ellis’s Blog Tue, 05 May 2009 07:49:13 +0000 http://kohari.org/2009/02/25/ninject-2-reaches-beta/#comment-253 [...] as Nate says in his post about Ninject 2.0, the behaviour has changed so that when it does not have the InjectAttribute applied to any [...] [...] as Nate says in his post about Ninject 2.0, the behaviour has changed so that when it does not have the InjectAttribute applied to any [...]

]]>