<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Discord&amp;Rhyme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kohari.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kohari.org</link>
	<description>Rambling and occasional wisdom from Nate Kohari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Functional Magic by Functional Magic &#171; It&#039;s a Virtual Life</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2007/08/23/functional-magic/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Functional Magic &#171; It&#039;s a Virtual Life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/2007/08/23/functional-magic/#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://kohari.org/2007/08/23/functional-magic/ [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://kohari.org/2007/08/23/functional-magic/" rel="nofollow">http://kohari.org/2007/08/23/functional-magic/</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attributes? We Don&#8217;t Need No Stinkin&#8217; Attributes by IoC Container Configuration/Registration - Programmers Goodies</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/06/08/attributes-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-attributes/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IoC Container Configuration/Registration - Programmers Goodies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=98#comment-158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have to use Xml to configure the dependencies. I can just use straight up C# code. There are multiple ways of doing it also. I know other libraries have that feature, but Ninject offers fast instantiation, [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have to use Xml to configure the dependencies. I can just use straight up C# code. There are multiple ways of doing it also. I know other libraries have that feature, but Ninject offers fast instantiation, [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convenience Kills, or the Case Against RAD Tools by james mckay dot net &#187; Tourists and residents, Visual Studio and vim</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/08/18/convenience-kills/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james mckay dot net &#187; Tourists and residents, Visual Studio and vim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=97#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of us &#8212; people of the calibre of Jeremy Miller or Ayende &#8212; struggle without Resharper, as Rob Conery noted: Finally – I can’t tell you how ironic I continue to find it that the people who rip apart [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of us &#8212; people of the calibre of Jeremy Miller or Ayende &#8212; struggle without Resharper, as Rob Conery noted: Finally – I can’t tell you how ironic I continue to find it that the people who rip apart [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ALT.NET is the Opposition Party by Kanban in Software Development. Part 3: Andon and Jidoka &#8211; Handling Bugs and Emergency Fixes in Kanban &#124; Agile Development</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/12/18/altnet-is-the-opposition-party/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanban in Software Development. Part 3: Andon and Jidoka &#8211; Handling Bugs and Emergency Fixes in Kanban &#124; Agile Development]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=192#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#103;&#111; &#111;&#102; &#111;&#117;&#114; ego, &#119;&#101; &#099;&#097;&#110; be &#104;&#111;&#110;&#101;&#115;&#116; &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; ourselves and others, enabling everyone to &#111;&#119;&#110; &#101;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#121; part &#111;&#102; the [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#103;&#111; &#111;&#102; &#111;&#117;&#114; ego, &#119;&#101; &#099;&#097;&#110; be &#104;&#111;&#110;&#101;&#115;&#116; &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; ourselves and others, enabling everyone to &#111;&#119;&#110; &#101;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#121; part &#111;&#102; the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Justin Etheredge’s LINQ Challenge by The TekPub LINQ Challenge Part 2 – Faster Algorithms &#124; CodeThinked</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2010/01/08/justin-etheredges-linq-challenge/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The TekPub LINQ Challenge Part 2 – Faster Algorithms &#124; CodeThinked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/2010/01/08/justin-etheredges-linq-challenge/#comment-474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my friend Nate over at Kohari.org created an implementation very similar to mine, but had one major difference, and that was leveraging the fact that for any number, in order to [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my friend Nate over at Kohari.org created an implementation very similar to mine, but had one major difference, and that was leveraging the fact that for any number, in order to [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generic Variance in C# 4.0 by InterKnowlogy Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Evolution of Generics in C# 4.0</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2008/10/28/generic-variance-in-c-40/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[InterKnowlogy Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Evolution of Generics in C# 4.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=172#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] there are already some great posts that already explain this in much greater depth and detail: (Generic Variance in C# 4.0 by Discord &amp; Rhyme, What&#8217;s the difference between covariance and assignment [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are already some great posts that already explain this in much greater depth and detail: (Generic Variance in C# 4.0 by Discord &amp; Rhyme, What&#8217;s the difference between covariance and assignment [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Few Lessons Learned by Weekly Web Nuggets #73 : Code Monkey Labs</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2009/08/17/a-few-lessons-learned/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly Web Nuggets #73 : Code Monkey Labs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/2009/08/17/a-few-lessons-learned/#comment-462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A Few Lessons Learned: Nate Kohari shares a few of the lessons he&#039;s learned from running his own business. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Few Lessons Learned: Nate Kohari shares a few of the lessons he&#039;s learned from running his own business. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking Back by Michael Dubakov</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2010/08/24/looking-back/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Dubakov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=509#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had very similar feelings when I started TargetProcess 6 years ago. I did not go to extreme and left day job only after several releases when it was obvious that product will be quite successful. I worked 3-4 extra hours each day during about half a year. It was hard, but it was fun and really exciting. 

And I completely agree about technical excellence on early stages. However I was not as smart as you and we had to re-write full application from the scratch in 2 years after initial release. It took ~6 months for 4 people...

You&#039;ve created great product in a VERY short time frame.  Congrats!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had very similar feelings when I started TargetProcess 6 years ago. I did not go to extreme and left day job only after several releases when it was obvious that product will be quite successful. I worked 3-4 extra hours each day during about half a year. It was hard, but it was fun and really exciting. </p>
<p>And I completely agree about technical excellence on early stages. However I was not as smart as you and we had to re-write full application from the scratch in 2 years after initial release. It took ~6 months for 4 people&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve created great product in a VERY short time frame.  Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cache-and-Collect Lifecycle Management in Ninject 2.0 by Good read on the life and times of a Ninject object &#124; fzysqr.com</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2009/03/06/cache-and-collect-lifecycle-management-in-ninject-20/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Good read on the life and times of a Ninject object &#124; fzysqr.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/2009/03/06/cache-and-collect-lifecycle-management-in-ninject-20/#comment-332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2.0 IoC implementation yesterday when I came across this great post from the author of himself: Ninject 2.0 Object Lifcycle. The bug I was trying to squash turned out to be completely related to the scope of one of my [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.0 IoC implementation yesterday when I came across this great post from the author of himself: Ninject 2.0 Object Lifcycle. The bug I was trying to squash turned out to be completely related to the scope of one of my [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking Back by Tim Ruffles</title>
		<link>http://kohari.org/2010/08/24/looking-back/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Ruffles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohari.org/?p=509#comment-490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats - that&#039;s an impressive arc (if I&#039;m right, May &#039;09 -&gt; acquired &#039;10? Not clear from the text).

Good lessons in what to do - make&#039;em pay from day 1, so you know you&#039;re creating real value, drop every feature you can, and have a heap of passion for your product :)

Also impressed you successfully found a niche in project management software! Looks a lovely piece of software, nicely tailored to its user group.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats &#8211; that&#8217;s an impressive arc (if I&#8217;m right, May &#8217;09 -&gt; acquired &#8217;10? Not clear from the text).</p>
<p>Good lessons in what to do &#8211; make&#8217;em pay from day 1, so you know you&#8217;re creating real value, drop every feature you can, and have a heap of passion for your product <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also impressed you successfully found a niche in project management software! Looks a lovely piece of software, nicely tailored to its user group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

